Wichert Akkerman wrote: > On 5/3/10 12:51 , Martijn Faassen wrote: >> Wichert Akkerman wrote: >>> Can we please not rehash an old discussion or make this personal? This >>> has all been discussed too often already. >> As far as I know, I've *never* discussed this fork on this list, but I >> might be wrong; feel free to dig the archives. But that doesn't matter: >> the fork is still there. So: wtf, Wichert? > > Perhaps you haven't, but others have discussed the reason the fork was > cerated and why it still exists. Since then many things have happened > including the creation of the ZTK steering group, of which Hanno is a > member.
The ZTK steering group was created about a year ago, so I'm not sure what you're trying to suggest here. I just hope you're not suggesting I didn't do anything in 2009. By the way: at the time I invited Hanno into the group, but he declined then, and I respect that, but just so you know. I must say it totally baffles me that the ZTK was acceptable to Zope 2 until january, and became unacceptable at that point. All answers are probably in that mailing list thread, but I can't be bothered to look it up. Please just make the fork go away. Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
