On 5/3/10 13:07 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>> On 5/3/10 12:51 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
>>> Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>>>> Can we please not rehash an old discussion or make this personal? This
>>>> has all been discussed too often already.
>>> As far as I know, I've *never* discussed this fork on this list, but I
>>> might be wrong; feel free to dig the archives. But that doesn't matter:
>>> the fork is still there. So: wtf, Wichert?
>> Perhaps you haven't, but others have discussed the reason the fork was
>> cerated and why it still exists. Since then many things have happened
>> including the creation of the ZTK steering group, of which Hanno is a
>> member.
> The ZTK steering group was created about a year ago, so I'm not sure
> what you're trying to suggest here.

Sorry, my mistake. I meant the ZTK release manage group, not the now 
defunct ZTK steering group,

> I must say it totally baffles me that the ZTK was acceptable to Zope 2
> until january, and became unacceptable at that point. All answers are
> probably in that mailing list thread, but I can't be bothered to look it
> up. Please just make the fork go away.

The needed steps to do that can be found in the list archives.

Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to