On 5/3/10 13:07 , Martijn Faassen wrote: > Wichert Akkerman wrote: >> On 5/3/10 12:51 , Martijn Faassen wrote: >>> Wichert Akkerman wrote: >>>> Can we please not rehash an old discussion or make this personal? This >>>> has all been discussed too often already. >>> As far as I know, I've *never* discussed this fork on this list, but I >>> might be wrong; feel free to dig the archives. But that doesn't matter: >>> the fork is still there. So: wtf, Wichert? >> >> Perhaps you haven't, but others have discussed the reason the fork was >> cerated and why it still exists. Since then many things have happened >> including the creation of the ZTK steering group, of which Hanno is a >> member. > > The ZTK steering group was created about a year ago, so I'm not sure > what you're trying to suggest here.
Sorry, my mistake. I meant the ZTK release manage group, not the now defunct ZTK steering group, > I must say it totally baffles me that the ZTK was acceptable to Zope 2 > until january, and became unacceptable at that point. All answers are > probably in that mailing list thread, but I can't be bothered to look it > up. Please just make the fork go away. The needed steps to do that can be found in the list archives. Wichert. _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
