Wolfgang Schnerring <w...@gocept.com> writes: > * Lennart Regebro <rege...@gmail.com> [2012-08-19 13:01]: >> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Jens Vagelpohl <j...@dataflake.org> wrote: > As far as I understand it, the legal lynchpin is that using Github > (strongly) encourages merging code contributions of people that did not > sign a contributor agreement -- which is the same situation as if > someone attaches a patch file to a bug tracker ticket, but will be much > more frequent and likely to happen. > > Could we, then, adopt a policy that we only merge pull requests (or > whathaveyou) from people that have signed a contributor agreement? > a) Tres, Jens: Would that work from a legal perspective? > b) Ross, Alex: Would that still yield the advantages of the distributed > source control model?
+10 Absolutely, seems like the best way to do this is to use the existing zopefoundation github org and ensure that we only add members with merge/push permission that have signed the agreement. https://github.com/zopefoundation Ross _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
