-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > Julien Anguenot wrote: > >>Ok the problem is the doctype declaration on top of the macro files that >>force the tal interpretor to enter html mode and as far as I understand >>you can't have mix moded macros. > > > Exactly. I forgot to mention that in my follow-up... > > Btw, doctype declaration is something else. You probably just mean the > XML processing instruction.
sure. It was just before my investigation around the problem. > > >>If you change the doctype declaration with the xml header and add the >>xmlns declaration for tal, metal and i18n then everything's fine after. >> >>See for instance the navigation macros : >> >>http://svn.zope.org/Zope3/trunk/src/zope/app/rotterdam/navigation_macros.pt?rev=28163&view=auto >> >>If you change the header like this then it can be succesfully included : >> >><?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> >><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; >> xmlns:tal="http://xml.zope.org/namespaces/tal"; >> xmlns:metal="http://xml.zope.org/namespaces/metal"; >> xmlns:i18n="http://xml.zope.org/namespaces/i18n"; >> i18n:domain="zope"> >><body> >> >>What kind of issue could we have changing the headers like this on all >>the standard macros since it's xhtml already ? > > > I'm not sure if this is a good idea. Because once Zope3's macros are XML > mode, all other templates using those macros need to be XML mode. That, > in turn, means that all templates need to carry the <?xml ...?> > processing instruction because that's the only way XML mode is currently > triggered. Since that processing instruction is optional (as opposed to > namespace declarations which are mandatory), I wouldn't want to force it > on template authors. > I'm ok if we could have the default processing mode to XML on PT. Could someone explain me why two different processing modes exist ? > I would think changing the headers like the above AND changing the > default mode to XML mode at the same time would probably be more > appropriate because it would only introduce one upgrade hurdle (the > mandatory namespace declarations). > I'm ok with this. J. - -- Julien Anguenot | Nuxeo R&D (Paris, France) CPS Platform : http://www.cps-project.org Zope3 / ECM : http://www.z3lab.org mail: anguenot at nuxeo.com; tel: +33 (0) 6 72 57 57 66 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDFbfuGhoG8MxZ/pIRAtKoAJ0X21v6ky2w+Lp38WEFb/r+RdqJUQCbBu+T KYdn2kxrqFFe7WEFms22kxo= =z4Pz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list [email protected] Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
