Jim Fulton wrote:
Neither. I want to use ZCML's machinery to implement ZConfig's
- make it easier to define/customize ZConfig options, and
- maintain one rather than 2 configuration systems.
The end-user experience would be the same.
I'd love to see this ;-) At some point I want to do something that lets
you optionally use .conf format instead of .zcml, I reckon the above
would help but my foo is way too low right now to be able to help out
with it :-S
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
Zope3-dev mailing list