Jim Fulton wrote:
Neither.  I want to use ZCML's machinery to implement ZConfig's
syntax to:

- make it easier to define/customize ZConfig options, and

- maintain one rather than 2 configuration systems.

The end-user experience would be the same.

I'd love to see this ;-) At some point I want to do something that lets you optionally use .conf format instead of .zcml, I reckon the above would help but my foo is way too low right now to be able to help out with it :-S



Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
           - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

Zope3-dev mailing list
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to