Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 20 January 2006 07:36, Jim Fulton wrote:
See:
http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/ZConfigAndOtherFormatsForZCML
Comments and volunteers welcome.
I am +1.
However, there is another risk. If we support multiple formats then that means
that a developer will have to understand all of them, because if he wants to
use another package that uses format X but he is used to format Y, then he
has to learn format X. Of course this issue has been discussed in the context
of ZPT versus DTML a long time ago.
I've already listed that as a risk. OTOH, if we only reimplement the
ZConfig format with ZCML, we won't be introducing a new format. We'll
just be eliminating an engine.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
[email protected]
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
