Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
See:
http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/ZConfigAndOtherFormatsForZCML
Comments and volunteers welcome.
Jim
What is the fundamental difference between ZConfig and ZCML apart from
the esthetic appearance that everyone seems to be so concerned with?
ZConfig is also generally simpler. For example, it doesn't use XML
namespaces and is thus less extensible.
I
see that all the attributes in the ZCML format are presented as elements
in the ZConfig format.
They aren't XML, so they aren't elements. You could as easily argue
that the options in:
<foo>
x 1
y 2
</foo>
are really attributes of foo. In ZCML, this might have been:
<foo
x="1"
y="2"
/>
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
[email protected]
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
