On Jan 24, 2006, at 12:22 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:

Fred Drake wrote:
On 1/24/06, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:

However, I think one namespace for ZCML is enough.
Are you sure?
Perhaps it's reasonable to use a single namespace for all the ZCML
directives defined as part of the Zope 3 release.

Agreed.  Let's just do that.
...
Separate namespaces for separate business entities makes sense to me. What doesn't make sense to me is having separate namespaces for every subsystem, which is too deep a hierarchy.

I would be OK with that.  That seems like it's a reasonable compromise.

Gary
_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to