On Jan 24, 2006, at 12:22 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Fred Drake wrote:
On 1/24/06, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
However, I think one namespace for ZCML is enough.
Are you sure?
Perhaps it's reasonable to use a single namespace for all the ZCML
directives defined as part of the Zope 3 release.
Agreed. Let's just do that.
Separate namespaces for separate business entities makes sense to
me. What doesn't make sense to me is having separate namespaces for
every subsystem, which is too deep a hierarchy.
I would be OK with that. That seems like it's a reasonable compromise.
Zope3-dev mailing list