On Mar 5, 2006, at 11:34 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
My main point is that we need to consider each of these audiences, as
they have separate concerns. We need to be explicit about this and
have messages and technical solutions tailored to each audience.
Do we? Messages, perhaps, but we should also remember that Zope
*shouldn't* be all things to all people (because we'll fail
miserably at that). It should allow the most flexibility, but at
the end of the day, users will make a decision based on the trade-
off between what Zope is naturally good at and what it can be made
to do with some work.
I agree. IMO, "Zope" should mean "the publisher and the component
architecture, and maybe the security machinery", and other things
should be add-ons. I don't really know how much traction this idea
Zope3-dev mailing list