On Wednesday 16 August 2006 09:42, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Anyway, nothing is said about dependency on GPL-ed code. That's a
> different debate. It's strictly not against rules, but it does mean one
> expectation is broken: one might want to expect that all code in the
> repository is freely usable without having to worry about
> GPL-provisions. This is not the case for code that depends on GPL-ed
> code. Even though this may be already a grey area for other reasons, it
> still makes sense to think about the intent and people's expectations
> when checking in a codebase.

My expectation is that I have to read all included license files and the 
licenses of the dependencies. Remember, we are talking only about a 
dependency here, not even an inclusion. This case is much weaker than a lot 
of others.

Stephan Richter
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
Zope3-dev mailing list
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to