On Wednesday 16 August 2006 09:42, Martijn Faassen wrote: > Anyway, nothing is said about dependency on GPL-ed code. That's a > different debate. It's strictly not against rules, but it does mean one > expectation is broken: one might want to expect that all code in the > repository is freely usable without having to worry about > GPL-provisions. This is not the case for code that depends on GPL-ed > code. Even though this may be already a grey area for other reasons, it > still makes sense to think about the intent and people's expectations > when checking in a codebase.
My expectation is that I have to read all included license files and the licenses of the dependencies. Remember, we are talking only about a dependency here, not even an inclusion. This case is much weaker than a lot of others. Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student) Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com