On Tuesday 05 September 2006 15:03, Fred Drake wrote:
> On 9/5/06, Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > When I remember right, then I read an important sentence in the
> > Python style guide -- something along the lines: "This is a guide:
> > you should follow it but there are occasions when you may not do so with
> > good reasons."
> I don't know if this means you agree or not.
> I don't think this paragraph really applies to this discussion. Jim
> suggested that we change the Z3 style guide, and I'm suggesting that
> that's counter-productive. Clearly, existing code isn't affected
> immediately, and APIs can't be changed anyway.
BTW, we discussed this quiet heavily on #zope3-dev.
I think at the end Jim and I agreed that the zope.* namespace should follow
and keep following the current Zope 3 style guide. Other namespaces, such as
zc, z3c, lovely, etc can choose their own style guide but must be consistent
within the namespace. While Jim never acknowledged this final wording, I
consider silent as consent. :-)
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
Zope3-dev mailing list