On Tuesday 05 September 2006 15:03, Fred Drake wrote: > On 9/5/06, Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When I remember right, then I read an important sentence in the > > Python style guide -- something along the lines: "This is a guide: > > you should follow it but there are occasions when you may not do so with > > good reasons." > > I don't know if this means you agree or not. > > I don't think this paragraph really applies to this discussion. Jim > suggested that we change the Z3 style guide, and I'm suggesting that > that's counter-productive. Clearly, existing code isn't affected > immediately, and APIs can't be changed anyway.
BTW, we discussed this quiet heavily on #zope3-dev. I think at the end Jim and I agreed that the zope.* namespace should follow and keep following the current Zope 3 style guide. Other namespaces, such as zc, z3c, lovely, etc can choose their own style guide but must be consistent within the namespace. While Jim never acknowledged this final wording, I consider silent as consent. :-) Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student) Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list [email protected] Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
