Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 17 November 2006 03:43, Chris Withers wrote:
What do you suggest I do when the adapter needs to know the name it was
registered for?
You can make the name part of the adapter API.
Not sure what you mean by this?
However, I would suggest revising the design; I have never come across a
scenario where I wanted the name of the adapter be known within the adapter.
This seems to be a recipe for trouble.
I don't think it'll be a common pattern, but it doesn't feel right to me
that a named adapter (ie: one registered with a specific name) has no
way of finding out what name it has been registered with...
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
[email protected]
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
