Chris Withers wrote:
I don't think it'll be a common pattern, but it doesn't feel right to me
that a named adapter (ie: one registered with a specific name) has no
way of finding out what name it has been registered with...
Because the same adapter can be registered more than once, it would
actually need to find out all the names with which it was registered.
This seems somewhat analogous to a Python object being given multiple
names. In that case too, there is no way for the object to know what
it's names are.
Senior Software Engineer
Zope3-dev mailing list