On Sunday 07 October 2007 17:13, Martijn Faassen wrote: > I'm not saying an ecosystem approach is bad, if that's what Zope 3 wants > to be. I do think that such an approach needs to be supplemented by a > framework approach (and I've been putting work into one way to do that).
Why? I have no need for anything on top of Zope 3. I just need to have stable sets of packages. > If Zope 3 is an ecosystem, a "release" of Zope 3 the ecosystem doesn't > really make much sense. To follow the comparison with Linux > distribution, it's more like a "distribution" of an ecosystem. I don't understand that sentence. > I'd > therefore suggest that the release of Zope 3.4, if it ever actually > happens, will be the last release of Zope 3 the application server > framework. That would be really bad. Who defines stable sets then? Again, I think there is absolutely no need for another framework on top of Zope 3. Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student) Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3email@example.com Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com