Tom Hoffman wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll take a risk by stating the obvious.
If there will continue to be a release schedule for "Zope 3, the appserver" It
would reduce confusion to new users greatly to give the appserver release a
name
other than Zope.
Eg.
Current name Proposed name
------------ -------------
"Zope2" -> Zope
"Zope3, the libraries" -> Zope libraries
"Zope3 the appserver" -> Frobnozz
Isn't this release sort of the last of its kind, though? Kind of a
weird time for a name change
I've heard that rumored, but there's nothing indicating that in the release
announcement. There are forward looking statements in there: "tarballs... for
the last 3.4 series and probably for 3.5 as well." I take this to mean that
there's an intention to have a 3.5, 3.6, 3.7 release, etc, but past 3.5, the
release won't be packaged as a tarball. If this is the case, even if it's just
for 3.5, it would sure help reduce confusion to give this "release of packages"
(even if it's just a buildout and the KGS for that release) a name other than
"Zope".
Or if not, it would seem like there would be a better argument for the
new approach having a new name than the old one.
I'm not sure which is "the new approach" and which is the "old one"?
- C
_______________________________________________
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-users@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
