Chris Withers wrote at 2005-5-25 21:03 +0100:
>> I strongly argue against it. Fix "hasattr" in the Zope context,
>Make it so! :-)
_marker = 
def hasattr(obj, attr, marker):
a = getattr(obj, attr, _marker)
return a is not _marker
__builtin__.hasattr = hasattr
Easy enough, isn't it?
Way easier than to change "hasattr" anywhere it is now used.
Now, there need only to be someone who checks it in.
>> You are aware that this is in general *NOT* an emulation
>> of "hasattr".
>I didn't say it was ;-)
>> It may fail e.g. for properties.
>How would it fail for properties?
It fails for everything with a false value (None, 0, '', , ...).
Properties may have a false value.
>> And it would be so easy to fix "hasattr" ;-)
>then why haven't you done it? ;-)
I do not have write access to the Zope repository
(because ZC requires full patent indemnification to grant it
and I am unwilling to promise this).
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -