Chris Withers wrote at 2005-12-5 07:51 +0000:
>Andrew Milton wrote:
>> 
>> If there's noone around who can maintain it, then just say that. Don't say
>> there's 'a better way', because I can guarantee you the people using FCGI are
>> using it for a reason, 
>
>I haven't seen anyone come up with real justification for using FCGI...

The original poster explained his wish to retain FCGI:

  It reuses an existing connection between Apache and Zope
  while (he thinks and I might believe it) the recommended
  "mod_proxy" way each time opens a new connection.

  Thus, FastCGI might be more efficient.


-- 
Dieter
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )

Reply via email to