Chris Withers wrote at 2005-12-5 07:51 +0000: >Andrew Milton wrote: >> >> If there's noone around who can maintain it, then just say that. Don't say >> there's 'a better way', because I can guarantee you the people using FCGI are >> using it for a reason, > >I haven't seen anyone come up with real justification for using FCGI...
The original poster explained his wish to retain FCGI: It reuses an existing connection between Apache and Zope while (he thinks and I might believe it) the recommended "mod_proxy" way each time opens a new connection. Thus, FastCGI might be more efficient. -- Dieter _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
