Chris Withers wrote at 2005-12-5 07:51 +0000:
>Andrew Milton wrote:
>> If there's noone around who can maintain it, then just say that. Don't say
>> there's 'a better way', because I can guarantee you the people using FCGI are
>> using it for a reason,
>I haven't seen anyone come up with real justification for using FCGI...
The original poster explained his wish to retain FCGI:
It reuses an existing connection between Apache and Zope
while (he thinks and I might believe it) the recommended
"mod_proxy" way each time opens a new connection.
Thus, FastCGI might be more efficient.
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -