-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 16 May 2007, at 11:04, Paul Winkler wrote:

On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:47:11AM -0500, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 16 May 2007, at 10:13, Gaute Amundsen wrote:
Hm.. yes, that's the way we have been inclined.. just skip the
whole ZEO
thing, and go straight for Varnish integration. Lotts of old sinns
that have
to be paid off for that to work for everything however..

I don't think he advocates removing ZEO. That would be silly.

Why? I don't think ZEO is a panacea that magically makes apps faster
in all cases.  If you're not CPU-bound, the added network overhead and
increased chance of write conflicts might be a net loss.  Based on
everything he's said so far, it sounds like Gaute still has plenty of
headroom on his CPU.

There's a difference between scaling and making something faster. ZEO makes a single instance slower, right. But you can deal with more requests concurrently using ZEO. That's what I consider "scaling".

jens



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFGS3aoRAx5nvEhZLIRAn6rAJ9eL6UpxP0KsFgBsnntiltxejKLLQCfTZ5D
xYXbrs8cb0rzyndHeKGiSM8=
=MFcw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )

Reply via email to