-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 16 May 2007, at 11:04, Paul Winkler wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:47:11AM -0500, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 16 May 2007, at 10:13, Gaute Amundsen wrote:
Hm.. yes, that's the way we have been inclined.. just skip the
thing, and go straight for Varnish integration. Lotts of old sinns
to be paid off for that to work for everything however..
I don't think he advocates removing ZEO. That would be silly.
Why? I don't think ZEO is a panacea that magically makes apps faster
in all cases. If you're not CPU-bound, the added network overhead and
increased chance of write conflicts might be a net loss. Based on
everything he's said so far, it sounds like Gaute still has plenty of
headroom on his CPU.
There's a difference between scaling and making something faster. ZEO
makes a single instance slower, right. But you can deal with more
requests concurrently using ZEO. That's what I consider "scaling".
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -