-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 16 May 2007, at 16:52, Paul Winkler wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 04:24:56PM -0500, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
There's a difference between scaling and making something faster. ZEO
makes a single instance slower, right. But you can deal with more
requests concurrently using ZEO. That's what I consider "scaling".
Agreed. But at the same time, I don't think it makes sense to keep
deploying more and more badly tuned instances. That's what I consider
"blind shotgun scaling" :) You need to scale, but you also need to
tune - and you need to be pragmatic about which is the appropriate
approach at any given point in time.
My perspective is always high-traffic systems. I never even consider
small sites with few hits, for which ZEO won't do much. I have a
blind spot for those ;)
jens
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFGS46TRAx5nvEhZLIRAtImAJkBSPFTiwPO4k3LeydaI0udXtv2xwCfcyHQ
0qnQuviEBZsbMD9Uin+/d+8=
=kNMS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist - [email protected]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
