1. Sounds good.
2. It's exactly what I'm talking about, since it's called getTypeInfo...() and
not createType...() it looks like a noop. It does actually do something which
is also described in the previous line comments: "// ask for the type of the
root element to populate the cache with anonymous types". That's why I want to
keep the createType.. name.
Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
Post to : firstname.lastname@example.org
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp