> > > Why would you need a qualified value if the option itself is already
> > qualified?
> > I guess because the option name and the option value may not live in the
> > namespace.
> Why not? It's not as if you do schema validation on the options and their
> values. The option needs to be qualified to distinguish it from XQuery
> options, but the value needs not. And the validation is done entirely in the
> code so there is no schema validation.
Technically, it is up to us - does the op:enable option accept QName or string
values? If it is strings, I agree. If it is QNames, the namespace is important
Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
Post to : firstname.lastname@example.org
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp