Okay. So it is in agreement then (by all who bothered to post to this thread [?]):
1. We'll cut over to the new list domain name. Let's say Wednesday midday for this. 2. We'll put up a one-page-wonder web site with some house rules. I'll put out an announcement now. On 28 February 2010 22:16, Stephen Price <[email protected]> wrote: > I think as a start the "rules" or guide or whatever it ends up being called > should initially just document the house rules as they currently stand. > Like you said, things on [OT] posts, job ads, flamewars, Friday posts etc > etc. If its documented then ppl know where they stand. > The issue of [OT] posts is working pretty well. As long as ppl remember to > put the [OT] in their subject then those who feel strongly enough to do > something about not reading them can set up a rule to delete them. > > I keep imagining us as a group writing something that syncs elists with > forums but I have a vivid imagination. I also lack the interest right now to > start anything. I'm happy to play computer games at the end of the day, its > my mental unwind. :) > > cheers, > Stephen > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Ian Thomas <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I just think there should be rules down about whether OT is okay or not, >> top/bottom posting is polite or not, blah blah blah. >> >> So at least when there is an OT meltdown there is something to refer to. >> >> Well, that’s innocuous enough for most – w/o sounding too heavy (thinks: >> Neil, The Young Ones). >> >> I must say I’m amazed at some of the behaviour, lack of humour, and >> intolerance. And ignorance (sensu stricto) naiveté / lack of general >> knowledge– but it’s probably a good representation of society at large and I >> shouldn’t be surprised. >> >> Maybe there’s not enough smilies thrown in to enable recognition of gentle >> kidding or irony? >> >> It may require concrete examples of top-posting, inline etc – some (eg, >> Arjang and not confined to him) are sometimes a little naïve or >> under-educated about some things. >> >> Add: jobs, language, ad hominem / personal attacks. >> >> Anyway, I’m off to read a book. >> ------------------------------ >> >> Ian Thomas >> Victoria Park, Western Australia >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto: >> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *David Connors >> *Sent:* Sunday, 28 February 2010 7:02 PM >> >> *To:* Mailing List Administration >> *Subject:* Re: ozdotnet.com >> >> >> >> On 28 February 2010 20:54, Ian Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> What are your ideas about a charter, btw? >> >> -- >> David Connors ([email protected]) >> Software Engineer >> Codify Pty Ltd - www.codify.com >> Phone: +61 (7) 3210 6268 | Facsimile: +61 (7) 3210 6269 | Mobile: +61 417 >> 189 363 >> V-Card: https://www.codify.com/cards/davidconnors >> Address Info: https://www.codify.com/contact >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> admin mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/admin >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > admin mailing list > [email protected] > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/admin > > -- David Connors ([email protected]) Software Engineer Codify Pty Ltd - www.codify.com Phone: +61 (7) 3210 6268 | Facsimile: +61 (7) 3210 6269 | Mobile: +61 417 189 363 V-Card: https://www.codify.com/cards/davidconnors Address Info: https://www.codify.com/contact
<<330.gif>>
_______________________________________________ admin mailing list [email protected] http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/admin
