Le Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:22:53 +0100, "Kai Sterker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Why would a adonthell-devel package be required to build a wastesedge > package? The wastesedge configure script only checks for the presence > of the adonthell binary and whether it is sufficiently recent. This is > part of the normal package, so that should be enough. > > > > rpmlint is complaining (once again) because the doc of the API is > > not UTF-8. As it is generated by doxygen, I don't know how to > > correct this. > > A quick look at the doxygen manual didn't yield any clues how to set a > specific output encoding. Yeah, I could only find a "USE_WINDOWS_ENCODING" option but it didn't seem to work. > > Finally, I'm having trouble selecting the header files to include > > in the RPM. Some packaging guru told me that "rpmlint should tell > > me which one to choose but it doesn't because the Makefile doesn't > > install them the right way". > > They are not installed at all, I believe. To do that, you would have > to put something like > > pkgincludeadonthelldir = $(pkgincludedir)/adonthell > pkgincludeadonthell_HEADERS = ... > > int src/Makefile.am and list all header files there. > > But once again, it should not be necessary to create a devel package > (unless this is some weird requirement of rpm or Fedora) Huh ? Wastesedge doesn't need the header files of adonthell for building ? My mistake then. I thought adonthell was a library, so wastesedge would need the binaries to run, and the headers to build... Sorry for bothering, I only misunderstood :) Thanks for the hints Mathieu > > Kai > > > _______________________________________________ > Adonthell-general mailing list > Adonthell-general@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/adonthell-general _______________________________________________ Adonthell-general mailing list Adonthell-general@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/adonthell-general
