> >  In fact, I have a working RPM of adonthell, but it will never be
> >  accepted in Fedora repositories as rpmlint is complaining about
> > some "zero-length files" in the API documentation. As I don't know
> > how doxygen works, I don't know if I can just remove them :S
> 
> These seem to be image maps describing which part of an image is
> clickable. Even if they are empty, there might be a usemap attribute
> that refers to them. I would guess that most browsers would still
> render things correctly, even if the file is not available.
> 
> But again, it might be easier to just exclude the API doc from the
> rpm. If at all, it should go into a devel or doc rpm, IMO.
That's not a bad idea... o_O

I'll ask packaging gurus what they think about that when I submit the
RPM for inclusion :)


_______________________________________________
Adonthell-general mailing list
Adonthell-general@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/adonthell-general

Reply via email to