> > In fact, I have a working RPM of adonthell, but it will never be > > accepted in Fedora repositories as rpmlint is complaining about > > some "zero-length files" in the API documentation. As I don't know > > how doxygen works, I don't know if I can just remove them :S > > These seem to be image maps describing which part of an image is > clickable. Even if they are empty, there might be a usemap attribute > that refers to them. I would guess that most browsers would still > render things correctly, even if the file is not available. > > But again, it might be easier to just exclude the API doc from the > rpm. If at all, it should go into a devel or doc rpm, IMO. That's not a bad idea... o_O
I'll ask packaging gurus what they think about that when I submit the RPM for inclusion :) _______________________________________________ Adonthell-general mailing list Adonthell-general@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/adonthell-general