On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Valentina Poletti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/25/08, Vladimir Nesov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Why would anyone suggest creating a disaster, as you pose the question? >> > > Also agree. As far as you know, has anyone, including Eliezer, suggested any > method or approach (as theoretical or complicated as it may be) to solve > this problem? I'm asking this because the Singularity has confidence in > creating a self-improving AGI in the next few decades, and, assuming they > have no intention to create the above mentioned disaster.. I figure someone > must have figured some way to approach this problem.
I see no realistic alternative (as in with high probability of occurring in actual future) to creating a Friendly AI. If we don't, we are likely doomed one way or another, most thoroughly through Unfriendly AI. As I mentioned, one way to see Friendly AI is as a second chance substrate, which is a first thing to do to ensure any kind of safety from fatal or just vanilla bad mistakes in the future. Of course, establishing a dynamics that know a mistake and when to recover or prevent or guide is a tricky part. -- Vladimir Nesov [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://causalityrelay.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=111637683-c8fa51 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
