Mike, If you think your AGI know-how is superior to the know-how of those who already built testable thinking machines then why don't you try to build one yourself? Maybe you would learn more that way than when spending significant amount of time trying to sort out great incompatibilities between your views and views of the other AGI researchers. If you don't have resources to build the system then, perhaps, you could just put together some architecture doc (including your definitions of important terms) for your as-simple-as-possible AGI. The talk could then be more specific/interesting/fruitful for everyone involved. Sorry if I'm missing something. I'm reading this list only occasionally. But when I get to your posts, I often see things very differently and I know I'm not alone. I guess, if you try to view things from developers perspective + if you systematically move forward improving a particular AGI design, your views would change drastically. Just my opinion..
Regards, Jiri Jelinek ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=111637683-c8fa51 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
