Nicole, yes, Rosato I think, across the road. Ok with me.
Cheers
Peter

Peter G Burton PhD
http://homepage.mac.com/blinkcentral
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
intl 61 (0) 400 194 333

 
On Wednesday, October 15, 2008, at 09:08PM, "Ben Goertzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>Matt wrote, in reply to me:
>
>
>> > An AI twice as smart as any human could figure
>> > out how to use the resources at his disposal to
>> > help him create an AI 3 times as smart as any
>> > human.  These AI's will not be brains in vats.
>> > They will have resources at their disposal.
>>
>> It depends on what you mean by "twice as smart". Do you mean twice as many
>> brain cells? Twice as much memory? Twice as fast? Twice as much knowledge?
>> Able to score 200 on an adult IQ test (if such a thing existed)?
>>
>> Unless you tell me otherwise, I have to assume that it means "able to do
>> what 2 people can do" (or 3 or 10, the exact number isn't important). In
>> that case, I have to argue it is the global brain that is creating the AI
>> with a very tiny bit of help from the parent AI. You would get the same
>> result by hiring more people.
>
>
>
>Whatever ...
>
>You are IMO just distracting attention from the main point, by making odd
>definitions...
>
>No, of course my colloquial phrase "twice as smart" does not mean "as smart
>as two people put together".   That is not the accepted interpretation of
>that colloquialism and you know it!
>
>To make my statement clearer, one approach is to forget about quantitating
>intelligence for the moment...
>
>Let's talk about qualitative differences in intelligence.  Do you agree that
>a dog is qualitatively much more intelligent than a roach, and a human is
>qualitatively much more intelligent than a dog?
>
>In this sense I could replace
>
>> An AI twice as smart as any human could figure
>> out how to use the resources at his disposal to
>> help him create an AI 3 times as smart as any
>> human.  These AI's will not be brains in vats.
>> They will have resources at their disposal.
>
>with
>
>****
>An AI that is qualitatively much smarter than
> any human could figure
>  out how to use the resources at his disposal to
>  help it create an AI that is qualitatively much
>smarter than it.
>
>  These AI's will not be brains in vats.
>  They will have resources at their disposal.
>****
>
>On the other hand, if you insist on mathematical
>definitions of intelligence, we could talk about, say,
>the intelligence of a system
>as the "total prediction difficulty of
>the set S of sequences, with the property that the
>system can predict S during a period of time
>of length T".   We can define prediction difficulty
>as Shane Legg does in his PhD thesis.  We can
>then average this over various time-lengths T,
>using some appropriate weighting function.
>
>(I'm not positing the above as an ideal definition
>of intelligence ... just throwing one definition
>out there... my conceptual point is quite independent
>of the specific definition of intelligence you choose)
>
>Using this sort of definition, my statement is surely
>true, though it would take work to prove it.
>
>Using this sort of definition, a system A2 that is
>twice as smart as system A1, if allowed to interact
>with an appropriate
>environment vastly more complex than either
>of the systems, would surely be capable of modifying
>itself into a system A3 that is twice as smart as A2.
>
>This seems extremely obvious and I don't want to
>spend time right now proving it formally.  No doubt
>writing out the proof would reveal various mathematical
>conditions on the theorem statement...
>
>-- Ben G
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------
>agi
>Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
>RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
>Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
>Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>


-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=117534816-b15a34
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to