You can see though how genetic memory encoding opens the door to
acquired phenotype changes over an organism's life, though, and those
could become communicable. I think Lysenko was onto something like
this. Let us hope all those Soviet farmers wouldn't have just starved!
;3

On 12/11/08, Matt Mahoney <matmaho...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- On Thu, 12/11/08, Eric Burton <brila...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It's all a big vindication for genetic memory, that's for certain. I
>> was comfortable with the notion of certain templates, archetypes,
>> being handed down as aspects of brain design via natural selection,
>> but this really clears the way for organisms' life experiences to
>> simply be copied in some form to their offspring. DNA form!
>
> No it's not.
>
> 1. There is no experimental evidence that learned memories are passed to
> offspring in humans or any other species.
>
> 2. If memory is encoded by DNA methylation as proposed in
> http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20026845.000-memories-may-be-stored-on-your-dna.html
> then how is the memory encoded in 10^11 separate neurons (not to mention
> connectivity information) transferred to a single egg or sperm cell with
> less than 10^5 genes? The proposed mechanism is to activate one gene and
> turn off another -- 1 or 2 bits.
>
> 3. The article at http://www.technologyreview.com/biomedicine/21801/ says
> nothing about where memory is encoded, only that memory might be enhanced by
> manipulating neuron chemistry. There is nothing controversial here. It is
> well known that certain drugs affect learning.
>
> 4. The memory mechanism proposed in
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16822969?ordinalpos=14&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
> is distinct from (2). It proposes protein regulation at the mRNA level near
> synapses (consistent with the Hebbian model) rather than DNA in the nucleus.
> Such changes could not make their way back to the nucleus unless there was a
> mechanism to chemically distinguish the tens of thousands of synapses and
> encode this information, along with the connectivity information (about 10^6
> bits per neuron) back to the nuclear DNA.
>
> Last week I showed how learning could occur in neurons rather than synapses
> in randomly and sparsely connected neural networks where all of the outputs
> of a neuron are constrained to have identical weights. The network is
> trained by tuning neurons toward excitation or inhibition to reduce the
> output error. In general an arbitrary X to Y bit binary function with N = Y
> 2^X bits of complexity can be learned using about 1.5N to 2N neurons with ~
> N^1/2 synapses each and ~N log N training cycles. As an example I posted a
> program that learns a 3 by 3 bit multiplier in about 20 minutes on a PC
> using 640 neurons with 36 connections each.
>
> This is slower than Hebbian learning by a factor of O(N^1/2) on sequential
> computers, as well as being inefficient because sparse networks cannot be
> simulated efficiently using typical vector processing parallel hardware or
> memory optimized for sequential access. However this architecture is what we
> actually observe in neural tissue, which nevertheless does everything in
> parallel. The presence of neuron-centered learning does not preclude Hebbian
> learning occurring at the same time (perhaps at a different rate). However,
> the number of neurons (10^11) is much closer to Landauer's estimate of human
> long term memory capacity (10^9 bits) than the number of synapses (10^15).
>
> However, I don't mean to suggest that memory in either form can be
> inherited. There is no biological evidence for such a thing.
>
> -- Matt Mahoney, matmaho...@yahoo.com
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> agi
> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
> RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
> Modify Your Subscription:
> https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>


-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=123753653-47f84b
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to