Thanks Justin, I would like to see some justification for this change, or even better, see it reversed.
>From my experience I can see no justification for such a change. Lets put it to the test! Or see the change REVERSED. On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Justin Couch <jus...@vlc.com.au> wrote: > In the most recent draft of MOSP 3 (19 June 2015), a new requirement has > been added in by the GFA. A form 2 now lasts only for the lesser of 250 > hours, or 12 months (Section 11.3.2). Particularly for clubs with high use > two seaters, this is an extremely expensive burden. For example, at > Southern Cross, this means we'll be almost doubling our Form 2 inspections > across the fleet in any given 12 month period. Our DG1000 will be probably > subject to 3 most years. > > Is anyone aware of the rationale behind this change? Considering most of > these high use gliders are already subject to 100hrly and/or 3 month > inspections, it seems like an extremely expensive exercise that is will not > make us any safer. These gliders have been operating for years or decades > with a single yearly main checkup. > > -- > Justin Couch http://www.vlc.com.au/ > _______________________________________________ > Aus-soaring mailing list > Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net > To check or change subscription details, visit: > http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring >
_______________________________________________ Aus-soaring mailing list Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net To check or change subscription details, visit: http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
