I suggest to continue these discussions on the list bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net that is better suited for this.
On Tue May 18 2010 Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > I've tried to do some minor BBDB hacking, mainly just maintenance to > keep the Debian package working, and have my current version in > http://github.com/barak/BBDB > but it sounds like what you've done is the right thing. Thank you. -- I'll take a look at this page. Possibly some of your patches might be obsolete for my version. > Unless you object, I'll put your version on a branch in that repo. > This would be easier if you were to tell me which exact point you > branched off from. That's fine with me. I already discovered some minor bugs in the version that I posted on gnu-emacs-sources and I am sure there will be more. It will probably be best to put my code in some openly accessible version control system. (I do not know anything about such systems. I am a happy user of RCS for my small projects.) I have contacted the current official maintainer of BBDB. But up to now I did not get any response. > Also: care to try for a merge? It sounds like your version would be > more suitable for the Debian bbdb package; does that sound right > to you? Again, that's certainly fine with me. (I'll look at this.) > Where did you put the defun of bbdb-record-notes ? It's gone from > bbdb.el, yet is still used by bbdb-record-note etc. The old BBDB distinguished between "notes" and "raw-notes". This distinction does not exist anymore in my code. So bbdb-record-notes is directly defined by the macro bbdb-defstruct. Cheers, Roland ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
