Roland Winkler <winkler <at> gnu.org> writes: > On Sun Aug 31 2014 Rene wrote: > > When using "*M-x bbdb-print" or even "M-x bbdb-print" I only get a TeX file > > containing the current displayed record (the one my pointer is on in the > > *BBDB* buffer). > > All these commands use the prefix `*', see the docstring of bbdb-print.
Strange thing. The prefix `*' (bbdb-do-all-records) works alright for commands like "*t" or "*m". On the other hand, the prefix doesn't seem to be working with "*M-x bbdb-print". I keep getting a TeX file holding only the record my pointer is on. How is that possible? Any idea about how to fix that? -- rene ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
