On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:35:54 +0200 Gábor Stefanik <netrolller...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Chris Vine <ch...@cvine.freeserve.co.uk> > wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 9:45:40 -0400 > > <fre...@carolina.rr.com> wrote: > > > >> 2.6.32-rc? and wireless-compat was thought to work as well as > >> wireless-testing ... hmmm > > > > Ah right. I had been trying 2.6.32-rc4 by itself and compat-wireless > > with 2.6.31. If I build compat-wireless on top of 2.6.32-rc.4 the dma > > errors appear to go away but the encryption modules won't load so it > > is not usable. > > > > I think I will try again in a few months time when things have settled > > down a bit. (Or possibly pull wireless-testing from git once 2.6.32 > > comes out.) > > > > Chris > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Bcm43xx-dev mailing list > > Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de > > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev > > > > Could you please try the real wireless-testing tree (as opposed to > compat-wireless)? > > Also, what I noticed is that everyone with this problem appears to > have an Intel Atom CPU... weird. Maybe something weird is going on > with the Atom chipset's DMA handling. > No, it's not only Atom. I see it on Intel T4200 (dual core Pentium, 45nm, 800MHz FSB, GL40/GM45 chipset). Lenovo G530 laptop. regards, ........ Charlie _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
