Hi David, David Nelson wrote on 2011-09-13 11:59:
I know there are no easy, immediate solutions, but there are people who would like to see the SC regard this Base issue as being something important to deal with.
that's fine, of course. My point is not that the SC does not want to get involved into this - my point is that more and more discussions are moved to this mailing list rather than where they belong, effectively rendering the initial approach of this list useless (trackability and transparency of SC decisions and votes).
Try to look at the list archives, and try to identify the votes of the SC easily and quickly: it's impossible. That's my point.
Florian -- Florian Effenberger <flo...@documentfoundation.org> Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108 Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
