Hi all,
FYI: The mail below contains parts of confidential communication. Of
course selective, causing an unfair unbalanced picture of reality.
I make a strong call for an end to this show. Please let's move this to
a board meeting. Failing, to protect TDF, we'll consider moderating this
list again..?
At this stage, a significant board majority considers it very wise that
TDF will not pay people to compete with contributing ecosystem parties.
And there is no need for it: TDF's goals provide an huge amount of
opportunities in multiple directions that are far from realized and all
need time and attention.
It's a sane thing, that obviously may evolve, as everything changes over
time. But trying to put such a policy in a proposal, easily leads to
legal, communication and personal struggles - as we've seen. So the
proposal up now is simple and positive: a strong need; a whole load of
clear tasks; hiring makes sense; and lets execute.
As with all hiring proposals we had so far, legal advice seems simply
unnecessary?
Cheers,
Cor
Paolo Vecchi wrote on 30/11/2022 22:42:
Hi Michael and all,
On 30/11/2022 11:55, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi there,
On 29/11/2022 23:38, Franklin Weng wrote:
> Believe me or not.
Let me try to provide a quick counter-balance in this thread.
--
Cor Nouws, member Board of Directors
The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin
Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
Legal details: http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
GPD key ID: 0xB13480A6 - 591A 30A7 36A0 CE3C 3D28 A038 E49D 7365 B134 80A6
mobile : +31 (0)6 25 20 7001
skype : cornouws
blog : cor4office-nl.blogspot.com
jabber : cor4off...@jabber.org
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
