Hi all, Hi Marina, I have wollmux installed With the latest released version from last year from December 30 2022, you need JRE 11.
I'm using Windows 11, the wollmux.conf must look like this DEFAULT_CONTEXT "./config/" %include "./config/conf/main.conf" %include "./config/conf/wollmuxbar_standard.conf" Unfortunately, not all templates are found yet, even though they are in the correct folder. I don't think an extra WollMux mailing list makes not sense. This does not promote the awareness of wollmux. Possibly. Perhaps mark the subject with [WollMux]? Greetings Susanne -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Thorsten Behrens <t...@libreoffice.org> Gesendet: Montag, 2. Januar 2023 13:26 An: Marina Latini <marina.lat...@libreoffice.org> Cc: TDF Board Discussion <board-discuss@documentfoundation.org> Betreff: Re: [board-discuss] WollMux adoption proposal for The Document Foundation Hi Marina, all, Marina Latini wrote: > No no, it makes sense to keep WollMux under the LibreOffice org, I > agree. If you are fine with the current status, can we start to work on WollMux? > I'd love to! :) (Gabor is getting the last few handbook pages' existing German translation put up on the wiki; and I'll see to get at least a basic CI job setup going by early next week - but none of that should block others from starting the work) > But, apart from WollMux... I think we could take this opportunity also > for a clean-up of repos in https://github.com/tdf. ;) You mentioned > the DLP libraries, but libcmis is hosted under the TDF organisation, > and, if I'm not mistaken, the libraries from the DLP aren't > LibreOffice only but can be reused also elsewhere. > Yep, that's true - Calligra, Inkscape and Scribus use at least some of them. > Under the TDF organisation there are also other repos that should > probably be archived (but we are going semi off-topic now). ;) > Also true, e.g. when looking at website stuff. BTW, 'archiving' on github is something conceptually very close to our atticization - we should evaluate setting the archive flag within that framework IMO. > We could also mention that we have the other LibreOffice organisation > and cross link from tdf to LibreOffice too. > Given that the main readme was misleading you, that's certainly useful. > But...for this clean-up, where we can continue this discussion? this > list doesn't look like the right place to me. :) > Doesn't feel terribly off-topic here (dev list would also not be a 100% on-topic match, neither website or marketing? - but for very generic discussions, there's always the global discuss list of course). Something else - does anybody see the need for a dedicated wollmux mailing list? I didn't ask for one (and actually try to avoid silo-ed low-traffic email lists, and nudge people onto the main dev list), but not strictly against one either. The old wollmux project had one at joinup IIRC, but it's dormant since a long time. Cheers, -- Thorsten -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
