Hi all,
IMHO it must get more granular and also I really don't like the fact that
CDKException is a checked exception. In most of the cases it is just annoying
and useless.
I know, endless debate and maybe you have had it several times but for me as
user as it is now: annoying like hell. Just like pure JDBC.
other frameworks that use Runtime exceptions are IMHO a lot more friendlier to
work with.
Regards,
Joos
> From: egon.willigha...@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 12:06:29 +0200
> To: cdk-de...@lists.sf.net; cdk-u...@lists.sf.net
> Subject: [Cdk-user] Exceptions again: three designs. What will we use in the
> next CDK series (1.6 or 2.0)?
>
> Hi developers *and* users,
>
> shall we try to come up with a good Exception design for master?
>
> Currently, the CDK uses a mix of various CDK specific exceptions,
> though we officially promote the single use of CDKException. Others
> have requested to use more general exceptions, like
> IllegalArgumentException.
>
> Today, another user problem came up, a NPE upon missing 2D coordinates
> in the renderer, where in fact a IllegalArgumentException may be
> appropriate, with a good error message.
>
> I like to discuss this issue, and in particular these three designs:
>
> 1. Only CDKException with proper messages (current formal design of
> the CDK, which several classes violate)
> 2. Use CDK-specific, tuned exceptions, such as NoSuchAtomTypeException
> (existing already) and Missing2DCoordinatesException
> 3. Use Java Exceptions only, like IllegalArgumentException with proper
> messages
>
> There are pros and cons for all of them. Let's try to get them clear first.
>
> Egon
>
>
> --
> Dr E.L. Willighagen
> Postdoctoral Researcher
> Institutet för miljömedicin
> Karolinska Institutet (http://ki.se/imm)
> Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
> LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw
> Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
> PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> _______________________________________________
> Cdk-user mailing list
> Cdk-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-user
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Cdk-user mailing list
Cdk-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-user
