On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Thomas Strunz <beginn...@hotmail.de> wrote: > IMHO it must get more granular and also I really don't like the fact that > CDKException is a checked exception. In most of the cases it is just > annoying and useless.
I think I disagree. You can get any Runtime exception and never know what to expect. Invalid input is very common here, and your software needs to recover from that, and differently from other situations. I think a Runtime exception should only happen when something *unexpected* happened, like OutOfMemory or so... > I know, endless debate and maybe you have had it several times but for me as > user as it is now: annoying like hell. Just like pure JDBC. > > other frameworks that use Runtime exceptions are IMHO a lot more friendlier > to work with. Why do you find it annoying? And useless? Why do you find Runtime exceptions from user friendly? Egon -- Dr E.L. Willighagen Postdoctoral Researcher Institutet för miljömedicin Karolinska Institutet (http://ki.se/imm) Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Cdk-user mailing list Cdk-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-user
