On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Thomas Strunz <beginn...@hotmail.de> wrote:
> But does it enforce good/non-harmful error handling?
>
> I would say a very large amount will be infamous:
>
> try{
> ...
> } catch(Exception ex){
> }
>
> or
>
> try{
> ...
> } catch(Exception ex){
> ex.printStacksTrace()
> }
Ah, not to disarm you from your argument... but this can be catched
with PMD. (Of course, people do need to use it :)
> I mean checked exceptions assume developers are bad/lazy (eg. can't document
> and don't read documentation) but they expect them to be able to do proper
> exception handling?
Still, the community moves in a better scientific code base quality...
think, the "Open Research Computation"
(http://www.openresearchcomputation.com/).
> Anyway, maybe I'm just too inexperienced to see the reason. The most
> important thing for CDK is to throw exceptions more granular.
Yes, I think we all support that aspect.
> If you catch a
> CDKException right now I'm still pretty clueless what it actually means (IO;
> AtomType,...).
Yes, and we will move away from that...
BTW, did someone stand up to draft a proposal (can be informal, no big
deal, just for further discussions...)
Egon
--
Dr E.L. Willighagen
Postdoctoral Researcher
Institutet för miljömedicin
Karolinska Institutet (http://ki.se/imm)
Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw
Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AppSumo Presents a FREE Video for the SourceForge Community by Eric
Ries, the creator of the Lean Startup Methodology on "Lean Startup
Secrets Revealed." This video shows you how to validate your ideas,
optimize your ideas and identify your business strategy.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appsumosfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Cdk-user mailing list
Cdk-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-user
