The basic concepts of Fusebox haven't changed that much, and to me, spending time learning an old version when you're just starting out doesn't make any sense whatsoever. The underlying framework core has changed to be all CFCs, but that doesn't mean the end user has to know anything about CFCs to use it. Furthermore, I'd disagree with your contention that learning FB3 is any easier than learning the current version. To me it just seems like it's a waste of time and ill advised to learn an old version when you're just going to have to learn the new versions anyway if you intend on keeping up with FB in your development.
On 3/13/07, RADEMAKERS Tanguy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matt, >General comment--I'm not sure why you'd learn a version of any >framework that's that old. Two reasons: 1) because it's easier to learn fb 3 than fb 5 (or 6 or 7 or whatever they're up to by now). and 2) because once you have learned fb 3, it will be easier to go on and learn fb 4, 5, 6, whatever. Remember, Joe is looking for something from which he can "transition" to a heavier framework. /t You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, please follow the instructions at http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm CFCDev is supported by: Katapult Media, Inc. We are cool code geeks looking for fun projects to rock! www.katapultmedia.com An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
-- Matt Woodward [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mattwoodward.com You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, please follow the instructions at http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm CFCDev is supported by: Katapult Media, Inc. We are cool code geeks looking for fun projects to rock! www.katapultmedia.com An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
