On 9/24/07, Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:29:25PM -0400, William Ramsay wrote: > > Just calling it produces r. > Yes, this is (afaik) a deviation from the standard. ... I want > an error if I forgot to receive all values, I don't want the first > value
This behaviour was changed for user convenience just before Chicken 2.0. The backstory is here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/chicken-users/2005-05/msg00042.html FYI, this behaviour is not a deviation from the standard, per se. R5RS says: "The effect of passing no value or more than one value to continuations that were not created by call-with-values is unspecified." So, implementations are free to error out, or to return a single value in the style of Common Lisp. _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
