David Fotland wrote: >> To be sure that I understand, MF orders the moves using static analysis, >> and >> then the ordering is further modified by RAVE observations? >> >> So when Many Faces accumulates Schedule(N) trials, it will restrict its >> attention to the N highest ranked moves according to the combined Static + >> UCT/RAVE? Or does MF restrict the choice to the highest N by Static eval, >> and then order the top N by UCT/RAVE? > >No, neither. Now I'm thinking that maybe I'm doing something different from >what I thought was described in the papers. I didn't look at them >carefully. I just took the name "Progressive widening", and invented >something that seems to work well.
It is an interesting answer. You don't use the combined values, also static evaluations, for Progressive widening. So what do you use? It sounds like a ManyFaces' secret. Could you tell us how much Elo rating you gained by this invention? -- Yamato _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
