David Fotland wrote: >Well I have no idea how much I gained from this. It might be weaker than >what everyone else is doing, since it seems I didn't implement this as it's >been described recently. My progressive widening only uses Rave values. >It's very simple. Others seem to have much more complex schemes. But I >don't think I implement Rave like others do either.
Your implementation must be very different from mine. Actually I don't use Progressive widening (or unpruning) at all. It's a mystery to me why others say it does work. -- Yamato _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
