On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 07:52:49AM +0200, Dave Cotton wrote: > Question really is who set the 6 month limit? If the mad rush to keep up > with the cycle causes the problems that are occurring at the moment then > it must be questioned. If the problem isn't faced up to, there may not > be a requirement for a six month cycle in the future, there may not be a > future.
You have a question about that? I think the answer is obvious. Mandrakesoft. There was some discussion about backing off on the rate of releases a while back. -- Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://ben.reser.org "What upsets me is not that you lied to me, but that from now on I can no longer believe you." -- Nietzsche
