* David Golden <xda...@gmail.com> [2009-10-09T07:50:07] > 17. Better formalization of license field > > Proposal: > > Replace the list of strings for the "license" field with something > extensible and unambiguous. (RicardoSignes)
All for it, obviously. > * There won't need to be a list, apart from perhaps 02packages. also, > cpan:///package/Software::License::Perl_5 works; it makes it easy to > re-use your own license in a machine-readable way by publishing it as a > package, and is namespaced and indexed; if it can't be found, treat as > Other rjbs 15:21, 28 August 2009 (BST) That's probably a form I'd approve of, if not just "assume it's a CPAN package." -- rjbs
