-Caveat Lector-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are 55 Republicans in the Senate, it will take 66
votes to convict. Conviction will not happen. Will there
be a 'paralyzing' trial'? I believe that a natural defense
for any later criminal trial would be 'double jeopardy'. I
believe Clinton has stated that he would not except a pardon
for his 'alleged' crimes.
His ace? He knows whom he got his 'job' from?
Tranquilzers, etc . . .?
MJ:
Article I, Section 3, Clause 6:
... no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of
two thirds of the Members present.
^^^ ^^^^^^ ^^ ^^^ ^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^
67 in the case of 100.
The Senate is NOT the House ... Clinton finds many Ds in opposition
to what he has done to THEIR party and its tradition. It would NOT
be advisable to 'jump' so quickly.
Regard$,
--MJ
I am certain that nothing has done so much to
destroy the juridicial safeguards of individual
freedom as the striving after this mirage of social
justice.
-- Fredrich von Hayek,
Economic Freedom and Representative Government; 1973
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
