At 01:04 PM 4/29/2001 -0400, Matthew Gaylor wrote:
>Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Right, in most circumstances you're not required to keep logs. But there 
>>are some cases, albeit a fairly narrow subset, in which you'd want to 
>>have log files that are available to you but not an adversary using legal 
>>process.
>>
>>-Declan
>
>Which would/could get you charged with obstruction of 
>justice/contempt/conspiracy etc, etc.  You can protect your log files 
>safely enough by not having any-  But protecting your real ASSets is a bit 
>more difficult.

Almost anything the court does not like can get you so charged.  So what 
else is new?  Still, if the information or principle is sufficiently 
important you will eventually be released (if you are even held).

steve

Reply via email to