On 2001-05-06 16:26:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Shouldn't that be
>
> second := "00" .. "60" *{ "." 1*("0".."9") )
>
> to deal with leap seconds?
Yes, thanks.
- ams
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time modules Rich Bowen
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time modules Abhijit Menon-Sen
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time module... Rich Bowen
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time mo... Abhijit Menon-Sen
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Tim... srl
- Time Zones: Was Re: Grand Unified Th... Rich Bowen
- Re: Time Zones: Was Re: Grand U... Abhijit Menon-Sen
- Re: Time Zones: Was Re: Grand U... srl
- Re: Time Zones: Was Re: Grand U... srl
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Tim... Dave Cross
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Dat... Abhijit Menon-Sen
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time modules Peter J. Acklam
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time modules Peter J. Acklam
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time module... Dave Rolsky
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time mo... Peter J. Acklam
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time module... Eugene van der Pijll
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time mo... Dave Rolsky
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Tim... John Peacock
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Dat... Rick Measham
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Dat... Dave Rolsky
