On 2001-05-06 11:15:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Now is about 20010506T073000+0530 localtime [...] > > Is this the fairly standard (or at least conventional) way to deal > with [timezones]? The "Z" or [+-]offset scheme I described is the ISO 8601 way to deal with it. As far as I know, the conventional method to handle (named) time zones is the Olson database <URL:ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/>. Shane -- I don't know how to handle DST. RFC 2445 and ISO 8601 both ignore it totally (which is the only sane thing to do :). Ideas? How would you handle it today? - ams
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time modules Chris Nandor
- Mac Epoch: Was Re: Grand Unified Theory of D... Rich Bowen
- Re: Mac Epoch: Was Re: Grand Unified The... Chris Nandor
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time modules Abhijit Menon-Sen
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time modules Rich Bowen
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time module... Abhijit Menon-Sen
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time mo... Rich Bowen
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Tim... Abhijit Menon-Sen
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Dat... srl
- Time Zones: Was Re: Grand Unifi... Rich Bowen
- Re: Time Zones: Was Re: Gra... Abhijit Menon-Sen
- Re: Time Zones: Was Re: Gra... srl
- Re: Time Zones: Was Re: Gra... srl
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Dat... Dave Cross
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of... Abhijit Menon-Sen
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time module... Peter J. Acklam
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time mo... Rich Bowen
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time module... Peter J. Acklam
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time mo... Dave Rolsky
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Tim... Peter J. Acklam
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time mo... Eugene van der Pijll