Andrey Rahmatullin - 05.02.20, 22:17:14 CET: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 07:44:43AM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > > > We just had a GR where the project voted it was just fine to > > > systemd all the things, so this sort of thing is to be expected. > > > > Are you suggesting that voters fully understood the implications? > > Is this OK now to replace everything with systemd counterparts? > > Yes. > > > I certainly voted with considerations for _init_ system. > > > > If I recall correctly, no GR option suggested to "use as much > > systemd > > components as possible" or I think the outcome of GR could have been > > different... > > The winning option says "Packages may use any systemd facility at the > package maintainer's discretion, provided that this is consistent with > other Policy requirements and the normal expectation that packages > shouldn't depend on experimental or unsupported (in Debian) features > of other packages". > You can read it at https://www.debian.org/vote/2019/vote_002#textb
Hmmm, for me this still reads different than: "Ok, let's change the default logging system." Cause if I understood above wording correctly, then it means a package may use a Systemd feature. But this would only affect this one package. However here a system wide default of the system is changed. Thanks, -- Martin