Raul Miller wrote: > [snip] > > But it matters for the Corel front end. > > What you're basically trying to show, I think, is that the Corel front > end isn't a derivative work of dpkg. > > What I'm trying to show is that it is -- and I've offered two pieces of > evidence that it is: > > (1) It won't behave according to the documentation if dpkg isn't present, and > (2) It's distributed with dpkg
It's also distributed with bash, the Linux kernel, and so on. Is it a derivative of all the software on the CD? [snip] -- | Jeff Teunissen -- President, Dusk To Dawn Computing -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Disclaimer: I am my employer, so anything I say goes for me too. :) | dusknet.dhis.net is a black hole for email. Use my Reply-To address. | Specializing in Debian GNU/Linux http://dusknet.dhis.net/~deek/